|


Number 50 • March/April 2006
Contents
For the Record: Recorded-Sound Studies
Nearing Completion by Nancy Davenport
Got Metadata? by Barrie Howard
CLIR Appoints Preservation Advisory Committee
Defining Place and a Sense of Community
through Collaborationby Scott W. Schwartz, Archivist
for Music and Fine Arts Sousa Archives and Center for American
Music, UIUC
Report Highlights Boat Library
Frye Institute Participants Named
For the Record
Recorded-Sound Studies Nearing Completion
by Nancy Davenport
Spring 2006 marks the culmination of several projects that
CLIR has been carrying out in partnership with the National
Recording Preservation Board (NRPB). The NRPB, established
at the Library of Congress by the National Recording Preservation
Act of 2000, was charged with studying and reporting on the
state of sound-recording preservation in the United States.
In 2001, the Library of Congress (LC) asked CLIR to develop
and implement the first phase of a national preservation plan
for recorded sound. To this end, CLIR has been undertaking
a range of work that identifies obstacles to the preservation
of and access to sound recordings made before 1972.
Survey of Barriers to Access
CLIR is completing a study that explores the range of factors—from
cataloging to physical deterioration to copyright—that threaten
future access to our recorded-sound heritage. The study draws
heavily on information gathered from interviews with a range
of stakeholders, such as curators, collectors, scholars, performers,
and rights holders. CLIR and LC expect to publish the report
later this year.
The Copyright Conundrum
Sound recordings made before 1972 are governed by a patchwork
of state laws, rather than by federal copyright law. The variation
in laws—and in how they have been interpreted—can cloud the
limits of legal use of our recorded heritage. Scholars may
be frustrated in their efforts to legally use old recordings
in research or teaching; librarians and archivists are often
confused as to whether they have the rights to grant access
to old recordings or to preserve them through reformatting.
To better undertstand the types of protections states extend
to pre-1972 sound recordings and what impact these laws may
have on the use of such recordings by nonprofit institutions,
CLIR commissioned American University law professor Peter Jaszi
to conduct a review of ten states. The states under study are:
Alabama, California, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, New
Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Mr.
Jaszi's findings will inform planning for a 50-state survey.
Mr. Jaszi's work will complement June Besek's Copyright Issues
Relevant to Digital Preservation and Dissemination of Pre-1972
Commercial Sound Recordings by Libraries and Archives, which
CLIR copublished with the Library of Congress in December 2005.
Ms. Besek, executive director of the Kernochan Center for Law,
Media and the Arts at Columbia Law School, is now working on
a second report that analyzes digital-preservation and digital-distribution
issues related to radio broadcast and pertinent unpublished
recordings.
Analog-to-Digital Conversion: Technical Issues
Forthcoming in March will be the first of two technical reports
on audio preservation. The report, Capturing Analog Sound for
Digital Preservation: Report of a Roundtable Discussion of
Best Practices for Transferring Analog Discs and Tapes, provides
recommendations on how best to prepare analog sound recordings
for digital transfer.
On March 10 and 11, 2006, CLIR hosted a second experts' roundtable,
titled "Issues in Digital Audio Preservation Planning and Management."
The meeting was framed by a series of white papers on such
topics as:
- storage and archiving solutions for smaller archives;
- measuring and evaluating analog-to-digital converters
for the purpose of long-term storage preservation;
- examination of established file formats; advantages of
each for archival and commercial purposes; related security
issues; and interoperability;
- how to increase efficiency in transferring analog discs
for digital preservation; and
- how the archival community can engage the scientific
community in solving important preservation problems.
CLIR and LC expect to publish a report of the second roundtable
later this year.
^ Top
Got Metadata?
by Barrie Howard
Imagine that you are a humanities scholar preparing to write
a paper about the impact of narrow-gauge railroad development
on westward expansion during the late nineteenth century in
the United States. You're interested in finding digital resources
to use as material for your work and in surveying the literature
to locate authors who have written on your subject or related
topics. Where would you begin?
First, let me suggest that a Google search is not the best
answer. Google's Web-crawling robots are very effective at
indexing and making searchable textual content from the surface
Web—the vast matrix of static documents on the Internet that
are woven together by a weft and woof of hyperlinks. However,
a significant proportion of the online information environment
is not indexed by conventional Web crawlers and therefore remains
hidden from researchers. You have to break the surface to get
to the good stuff.
The deep Web holds an immense knowledge base of scholarly
communication, from conference proceedings to dissertations
and theses. This heterogeneous body of knowledge is stored
in databases, digital archives, and institutional repositories.
It includes text, data sets, images, audio, and video. But
the inherent diversity of these resources and the storage systems
that contain them pose a challenge to resource discovery using
full-text indexes designed for searching documents on the surface
Web. So what's the alternative?
One solution is the Open Archives Initiative (OAI) Protocol
for Metadata Harvesting. OAI is a protocol to enable access
to scholarly content in the deep Web. This is accomplished
through resource description, metadata, and industry standards
for formatting, packaging, and transmitting information about
digital resources. Such metadata enables users to find, evaluate,
and access valuable content online.
The world according to OAI is divided into data providers
and service providers. Data providers create and expose, or
push, metadata records about information resources from servers
called repositories. Service providers harvest, or pull, records
from repositories and build user services around aggregations
of harvested metadata.
In 2004, the Digital Library Federation (DLF) was awarded
an Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) National
Leadership Grant for Libraries to drive forward adoption of
OAI in libraries. This research-and-demonstration project addresses
the needs of both data and service providers, through four
main components, each of which is briefly described below.
The project team has developed the DLF OAI Portal Prototype,
a finding system for searching harvested metadata about digital
resources held by DLF member libraries. The prototype is a
second-generation OAI finding system, built to demonstrate
what a service provider can do with harvested metadata. Supported
by the University of Michigan, the prototype allows searching
by single terms or phrases and the use of Boolean operators,
limiting by resource types, and sorting of results by title,
author, and date. Users can also browse results by institution
and can use a "bookbag" feature for downloading or e-mailing
selected results. The prototype is up and running as a beta
test, available from http://www.hti.umich.edu/cgi/b/bib/bib-idx?c=imls;page=simple.
In concert with another IMLS-grant team at the University
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), the DLF project team
is working to refine the reporting functions of the Experimental
OAI Registry at UIUC. The registry contains information about
OAI-compliant repositories, which some service providers will
find useful, and it moves the field one step closer to revealing
the scope of the OAI-service landscape.
Two other important deliverables for the IMLS-grant project
are a set of best practices guidelines, which will go to press
this spring, and a set of training modules for OAI implementation
that are available online from http://www.diglib.org/architectures/oai/imls2004/training/index.htm.
The OAI Best Practices, supported by DLF and the National Science
Digital Library, synthesize the lessons learned from early
adopters of OAI and make recommendations for authoring metadata
records that go beyond the basic requirements and increase
the use value of a record. Their purpose is to improve communication
between data and service providers.
The training curriculum, developed at Emory University, has
its greatest value in discussing the nuts and bolts of how
to implement and integrate OAI into library technical-services
infrastructures and production workflows. Many institutions
want to share their collections, but have no time and money
to waste on false starts. The grant-project team recognized
the importance of addressing these issues. The training modules
cover administrative planning concerns for library administrators,
deployment strategies for data providers, an overview of OAI-implementation
tools for data and service providers, and the summary of best
practices discussed above.
In summary, OAI enables libraries to share metadata and build
more-comprehensive discovery systems for their users.
Now flash back to the scenario mentioned at the top of this
article. Imagine that you're a savvy scholar who has access
to the rich resources of the deep Web because her library is
harvesting OAI metadata and has added a finding system to its
bundle of Web services. You would be able to discover a wealth
of digitized primary-source material and authoritative sources
on your topic, and you'd waste little time sifting through
irrelevant results or pursuing dead-end clickstreams. This
is not fiction and is possible because many libraries have
embraced OAI and are sharing metadata using the framework.
The results are improved Web services and empowered researchers.
Got metadata? Share it.
^ Top
CLIR Appoints Preservation Advisory Committee
CLIR has appointed an advisory committee to guide the development
of its preservation agenda. The committee is one of four being
formed to help plan work in CLIR's main areas of focus: place
as library, scholarly communication, preservation and stewardship,
and leadership. The preservation committee held its first meeting
February 24 and expects to submit recommendations for review
and adoption in late spring.
Michele Cloonan, Dean and Professor
Graduate School of Library & Information Science
Simmons College
Paul L. Conway, Director, Digital Asset Initiatives
Perkins Library System
Duke University
Evelyn Frangakis, Chief of Preservation
New York Public Library
Paul Gherman, University Librarian
Vanderbilt University
Karen Hunter, Senior Vice President
Elsevier, Inc.
Robert Kieft, Librarian of the College
Haverford College
William LeFurgy, Digital Initiatives Project Manager
Library of Congress
Carol Mandel, Dean of Libraries
New York University Libraries
James Neal, Vice President for Information Services and University
Librarian
Columbia University
Robert Oakley
Director of the Library and Professor of Law
Georgetown University Law Center
Bernard Reilly, Jr., President
Center for Research Libraries
James Reilly, Director, Image Permanence Institute
Rochester Institute of Technology
Mark Roosa, Dean of Libraries
Pepperdine University
Johan F. Steenbakkers, Director
e-Strategy & Property Management
Koninklijke Bibliotheek
^ Top
Defining Place and a Sense of Community through Collaboration
by Scott W. Schwartz, Archivist for Music and Fine Arts
Sousa Archives and Center for American Music, UIUC
Editor's note: The following article is the first
in a series that will examine the idea of "place as library,"
one of CLIR's four thematic areas of focus (see CLIR Issues 48). The articles will highlight ways in which libraries
are using their collections, expertise, and services beyond
their walls to engage with users, other campus units, and
the broader community. This article highlights recent activities
at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign to illustrate
the possibilities offered by collaboration with cultural
institutions on and off campus.
The public entrusts to libraries, archives, and museums the
responsibility for preserving the artifacts of culture over
time. These institutions incubate community and sense of place
by preserving society's accomplishments and promoting discovery
and new knowledge. Today, these institutions are finding that
collaboration is crucial for maintaining their relevance and
for enabling them to provide the highest-quality educational
service and public programming to students, faculty, and members
of their local and regional communities.
Annual Collaboration Celebrates America's Musical Heritage
The Library of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
and its Sousa Archives and Center for American Music (the Center)1
began developing creative collaborations inside and outside
the university in preparation for the university's 2004 celebration
of the sesquicentennial of John Philip Sousa's birth. The culmination
of planning for this event was the passage in October 2004
of Congressional Resolution 459, which declared November to
be American Music Month. The aim of American Music Month is
to foster understanding of America's diverse music heritage
and of the role of curators, archivists, and librarians in
preserving this material culture.
One highlight of the 2004 celebration was the November 6 football
game halftime extravaganza, Stars, Stripes and Sousa, during
which the university's band, the Marching Illini, performed
several Sousa marches to a near-capacity audience. The Center,
in collaboration with the university's library, School of Music,
and division of intercollegiate athletics, provided the music
and narrative explanations for the marches, using information
drawn from the Center's historical collections. The performance,
which transformed the traditional halftime ceremony into a
unique learning experience, concluded with a spirited rendition
of Sousa's Stars and Stripes Forever. The finale brought the
entire audience to its feet and was greeted with thunderous
applause.
National Collaboration Strengthens Outreach
The Smithsonian Institution invited the University of Illinois
into its prestigious Affiliations Program in September 2005.
Smithsonian Affiliations provide museums, archives, and libraries
from across the country a forum to showcase themselves and
their collections on a national stage. The program also enables
the Smithsonian Institution to more broadly share its artifacts,
programs, and expertise. This new relationship between the
Smithsonian Institution and University of Illinois continues
each institution's historic commitment to collaboration for
the betterment of learning and historic preservation. The partnership
also gives faculty and students an opportunity to participate
in a variety of internships and fellowships at and through
the Smithsonian Institution and to work with leaders from academic,
museum, archive, and library communities in our nation's capital.
Re-creating the Chautauqua
American Music Month 2006 will celebrate the hundredth anniversary
of the 1906 Eastern Illinois Chautauqua. Early twentieth-century
Chautauqua celebrations throughout the country brought together
leading artists, writers, performers, and scholars from around
the world for two-week summer camps for the advancement of
the arts and humanities in rural communities. The 2006 celebration
will focus on the Illinois Chautauqua and violin music because
Sousa began his musical training as a violinist. He believed
that great European symphonic music could be played by America's
wind bands in communities that had no easy access to symphonic
concerts. Such music would have been performed at Chautauqua
gatherings throughout the country.
To re-create the Chautauqua, the Center will collaborate with
the University of Illinois Library, the university's School
of Music, the Krannert Center for the Performing Arts, the
Krannert Art Museum, the Smithsonian Institution, WILL AM-FM-TV,
and the Champaign-Urbana Symphony. The month-long program will
explore both classical and popular music in concerts, dance
and theater performances, poetry readings, exhibits, and lectures.
Daytime concerts will be held for area youth, as will a repeat
performance of the popular Champaign Youth Fiddling Contest,
which was initiated during the 2005 music celebration.
One feature of this year's celebration will be a major exhibition
of the Axelrod String Quartet consisting of a matched set of
four Antonio Stradivarius instruments (two violins, a viola,
and a cello) from the Smithsonian Institution. The exhibit
will include seventeenth- and eighteenth-century paintings
from the Krannert Art Museum's collections and seminal publications
from the university's Rare Book & Manuscript Library. These
works will illustrate the historical and cultural links between
the visual, musical, and literary arts.
In addition, the Center will install exhibits featuring two
recently acquired collections—the Joseph Olivadoti Music and
Papers and the Eddie Alkire Papers and Hawaiian Guitars.2 A
performance of Sheridan's Ride, a dramatic musical re-enactment
of the Civil War, will highlight another historical work from
the Center's Sousa collection. The Marching Illini will perform
this music for the November 11 football game halftime show,
which will honor American veterans.
Another highlight of the event will be two performances by
the Smithsonian Chamber Ensemble, under the direction of Dr.
Kenneth Slowik, during which musicians will use the Axelrod
Stradivarius instruments. The instruments will also be used
for several master classes and open rehearsals. Several educational
outreach programs will be created in collaboration with Krannert
Art Museum's Arts on the Go, which brings historical art and
music artifacts from the university's collections to local
and regional public schools. This year's outreach will focus
on underserved communities within central Illinois.
Preserving, Affirming Community Identity
It is each generation's responsibility to learn from the material
culture of its predecessors. This knowledge solidifies our
understanding of ourselves as a community of individuals over
time and affirms our sense of place within society. While much
of each year's programming is devoted to performances and exhibitions
of historical music and artifacts, each event carries a message
to our public that America's cultural heritage has been preserved
largely through the efforts of librarians, archivists, and
curators. Affirming a sense of place and community identity
for America's music heritage is the primary purpose of the
Center's efforts to develop public programs and exhibitions
that have the power to return sound to the university's unique
collections of historic music and instruments.
FOOTNOTES
1 The Sousa Archives and Center for American Music (a single unit within the university), serves as a repository that documents the legacy and diverse heritage of this country's music culture. The University of Illinois Library is home to the world's largest collection of original and published music manuscripts of John Philip Sousa. It acquired the collection in 1932.
2 Joseph Olivadoti was an Italian oboist, composer, and educator who played for Chicago's Harold Bachman Million Dollar Band from 1920 to 1931 and for the Chicago Symphony Orchestra from 1926 to 1931. The Eddie Alkire Hawaiian guitars are considered to be the progenitors of the modern Hawaiian guitar in America.
^ Top
|

|
Report Highlights Boat Library
A
new report from CLIR, Shidhulai Swarnivar Sangstha: Bringing
Information Technology to Rural Bangladesh by Boat, describes
the innovative program that received the 2005 Bill & Melinda
Gates Foundation Access to Learning Award. Shidhulai Swarnivar
Sangstha (SSS) is a nongovernmental organization in Bangladesh
that organized the use of indigenous boats to provide residents
in the country's impoverished remote communities free public
access to computers and the Internet. In 2004, the SSS boat
program reached about 86,500 families. The report can be viewed
online at http://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract/pub136abst.html.
Print copies can also be ordered through the Web site.
|
^ Top
Frye Institute Participants Named
The following individuals have been selected for participation
in the 2005 Frye Leadership Institute. The Institute will be
held June 4–16 at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.
Ethan Benatan, Reed College
Vincent Boisselle, Trinity College
Braddlee, Simmons College
Jean-Claude Bradley, Drexel University
Barbara Brandt, Emory University
Diane Butler, Rice University
Mark Dahl, Lewis & Clark College
Bradley Daigle, University of Virginia
Stephen Davison, UCLA
Joanne Dehoney, The Ohio State University
Billie Dodge, Washington College
Victoria Duggan, Montgomery College
Steven Edscorn, Memphis Theological Seminary
Edward Evans, Purdue University
Rachel Frick, University of Richmond
David Futey, Stanford University
Marie Gayle, New York University
Gail Golderman, Union College
David Greenfield, Illinois State University
Mara Hancock, University of California, Berkeley
Lucy Holman-Rector, University of Baltimore
Kristine Jones, Colorado College
Kathleen Kern, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Benette Kriel, Stellenbosch University
Merri Beth, Lavagnino Indiana University
Thoreau Lovell, San Francisco State University
Dan Manier, University of Notre Dame
Janet McCue, Cornell University
Carole Meyers, Emory University
Ashley Montgomery, University of Maine at Farmington
Hester Mountifield, The University of Auckland
Mur Muchane, Davidson College
Layne Nordgren, Pacific Lutheran University
Robert Orr, Western Carolina University
Andrew Pace, North Carolina State University
L. Jason Parkhill, Washington & Jefferson College
Rebecca Petersen, Lesley University
Michael Richichi, Drew University
Suzanne Risley, Mitchell College
James Robertson, New Jersey Institute of Technology
Janet Scannell, Bryn Mawr College
Roxanne Sellberg, Northwestern University
Jorge Sosa Ortega, The American University of Paris
Jennifer Stringer, Stanford University
Patricia Tully, Wesleyan University
Lucinda Zoe, Eugenio Maria de Hostos Community College
^ Top
See all CLIR Issues >> |