 |
 Quick insight into information-investment
issues for presidents, CAOs, and other
campus leaders from the Council on Library and Information Resources
(CLIR)
Number 10, June 2002
The Issue for Presidents and CAOs:
What to Expect from Digital Library Development |
University presidents personally promoted the development
of some of today's most respected digital libraries, and several
arose out of campus-wide strategic planning for enhancing a
university's ability to compete for grants and contracts, good
students, and distinguished faculty. These are among findings
of a new study that will give academic executives of institutions
of all sizes insight into digital library development.
The Digital Library: A Biography, is the tentative
title of the study, planned for July publication by the Digital
Library Federation (DLF) and the Council on Library and Information
Resources (CLIR). Drawing on a survey of DLF-member institutions,
the study describes how differences in leadership, organization,
and relationships with academic departments and information
technology staffs have influenced the varying character of
digital libraries, and identifies stages in their development. |
The Start-Up Digital Library:
Experimenters in the "Skunk-Works" |
The DLF survey indicates that university digital libraries
in their start-up phase have had these characteristics:
- They focused more on technical experimentation than on
user expectations.
- They experimented with online access to library services
that are traditional, developing computer-accessible catalogs,
for example, and digital versions of reference materials.
- They developed outside of regular library units in relatively
autonomous "skunk-works" (research labs), without
the involvement of other library staff.
- Their funding came less from library budgets than from
external grants, which provided stature while reducing institutional
financial risks.
- They felt competitive with the digital library programs
of other universities, and this inhibited collaboration and
standards development.
- They hoped to develop electronic resources without disturbing
traditional library attitudes, organization, functions, and
staffing.
|
The Mature Digital Library:
Building it so They Will (and Can) Come |
The survey indicates that as digital libraries mature they
take on these characteristics:
- They focus more on user needs, working with and marketing
themselves to faculty members and students instead of assuming
that "if we build it, they will come."
- They work more on core technologies, policies, and professional
skill development than on individual, experimental projects.
- They support "e-scholarship"new kinds of
publications and other scholarly products made accessible
online rather than through printas well as digitized
library materials.
- They are better integrated with traditional libraries.
- They become proportionally more reliant upon core as opposed
to "soft" or external funding.
This is where many digital libraries are now. |
The Future Digital Library:
Collaboration Within and Beyond the Campus |
The authors of the study, Daniel Greenstein and Suzanne Thorin,
believe that as digital libraries continue to develop they
will have the following characteristics:
- Networked collections and services will be as central to
libraries as stacks and catalogs have been.
- Numerous lines in core budgets will provide digital library
funding.
- Experimentation will remain ongoing.
- Libraries will set collection, preservation, and access
priorities looking at all information formats together.
- Libraries will become more dependent on each other.
- Libraries will work on presenting electronic information
so that it best serves needs of student and faculty users,
and will establish media and technology centers where librarians,
faculty, and technologists can collaborate to meet research
and teaching needs.
|
Additional Information:
|
The study will be made available on CLIR's Web site and in
print form in July. Access information will be posted at http://www.clir.org/whatsnew.html. |
|