 |
Introduction
It has been said that Brazil is a country without a memory, firmly
rooted in the present and with its eyes on the future. Yet Brazil's
cultural heritage encompasses millennia of human endeavor, five centuries
of European colonization, and nearly two centuries of independence.
Its state and private museums, archives, universities, and libraries,
along with a multitude of private and municipal cultural and historical
associations and foundations, hold a rich heritage. However, hot,
damp, tropical conditions, or alternating dry and rainy weather,
combine with the constant threat of insects, industrial pollution,
and a low level of building maintenance to create serious environmental
challenges to the preservation of these holdings. While investment
has poured into economically productive activities over the last
several decades, finding resources for preserving Brazil's cultural
heritage has not been easy. Lack of awareness of both the costs and
benefits of preservation has made it difficult for advocates to adequately
defend preservation priorities. Few were aware that basic measures
can be very cost-effective, and the content and value of collections
were also not widely known. The solution to the problem then, as
now, is to implement preventive preservation measures while at the
same time producing inventories and educating the public about the
richness of the collections.
Project Overview
The project to translate and disseminate preservation knowledge
was part of a broader partnership between the Council on Library
and Information Resources (CLIR), which incorporates the former Commission
on Preservation and Access (CPA), and a consortium of Brazilian archival,
library, and museum institutions. The partnership was intended to
serve as an information network for preventive conservation for all
Brazilian institutions with collections on paper and film and in
digital form. This included federal, state, and municipal institutions;
public and private museums; universities; and local cultural institutions
and foundations.
Origins
In September 1994, representatives of 12 Latin American institutions
gathered to attend a preservation round table held in Quito, Ecuador.
The round table was sponsored by the Organization of American States
(OAS) as part of a cultural heritage preservation development program.
The Quito round table, which the OAS had begun in 1987, provided
a rare opportunity for Latin American archive, museum, and library
staff to discuss preservation conditions and devise an action plan
to improve them. The round table recommendations included providing
staff with technical and managerial training and up-to-date literature
on preservation translated from the best available sources.
Returning from the OAS workshop, Solange Zúñiga, then
director of research and documentation for Funarte (Brazil's National
Arts Foundation) and Ingrid Beck, preservation coordinator of Brazil's
National Archives, were determined to find a way to raise preservation
awareness in Brazil on a national scale and catalyze action to pursue
the twin goals of providing training and documentation. The Quito
recommendations echoed similar priorities that both had identified
while interviewing Brazilian institutions in June and July 1994 to
collect information for the Quito meeting.
In October 1994, Gina Machado, the project manager for culture at
Vitae, a not-for-profit organization in São Paulo, introduced
Beck and Zúñiga to Richard Ekman, secretary of The
Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Ekman had traveled to Brazil to explore
projects that would be suitable for foundation funding. Beck and
Zúñiga presented the idea of a Brazilian national preservation
training and information project to him. He put them in touch with
Hans Rütimann, international program officer of the Commission
on Preservation and Access. The CPA agreed to help Beck and Zúñiga
shape a proposal to The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation for a project
to translate and disseminate within Brazil technical literature on
preservation. CPA would be a partner in the project and would submit
a separate proposal to The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation for funds
to support project coordination.
By the end of the year, Beck and Zúñiga had formed
an initial working group of 22 colleagues from 18 archives, libraries,
and museums in Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, and Minas Gerais,
where these institutions are concentrated.
Organization and Funding
Late in 1994, Beck and Zúñiga began to develop the
first draft proposal for submission to The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
The working group took about a year to discuss and refine the proposal.
Amidst these discussions, the first step was to agree on the scope
of the project. The core idea was to translate and disseminate basic
literature on preservation; however, the project had to do more than
simply distribute documentation. Regional workshops to educate and
raise awareness of the importance and effectiveness of preservation
activities would also be required.
To know where to distribute the documentation and training opportunities
throughout Brazil would require a third task: a comprehensive survey
of Brazilian institutions. There were several inventories and guides
to institutions and collections, but there was no single, complete,
and up-to-date inventory of institutions with cultural document collections.
Moreover, the existing sources did not include information about
collection preservation or the composition of technical staff teams.
The working group decided that it needed to organize a comprehensive
mailing list, starting with the existing data, and carry out a targeted
survey that would gather all the information needed for the project.
In October 1995, the working group submitted a proposal to The Andrew
W. Mellon Foundation that incorporated three elements: preservation
literature in Portuguese, a survey and database of institutions,
and training workshops. The foundation formally announced its approval
of the proposal in January 1996. Vitae agreed to cosponsor the project
with The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and CLIR, and the Getulio Vargas
Foundation agreed to manage the grant funds. The National Archives
would host the project and contribute Beck's time as coordinator,
and Funarte would contribute logistical support, travel funds, and
Zúñiga's time as advisor. These six institutions signed
cooperative agreements, and in April 1996, the project was inaugurated
with a celebration that brought together representatives from the
18 institutions in the working group.
Over four years (19961999) the project has received $578,000.
The first two-year phase of the project was funded by The Andrew
W. Mellon Foundation ($210,000) and Vitae (about $41,500). During
this phase, CLIR provided an additional $18,500 from international
program funds and project coordination funds, and, more important,
access to technical information and advice. During the second phase
(19981999), The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation provided a second
grant of $265,000 and Vitae contributed $38,000. Prize money from
the Rodrigo Melo Franco de Andrade Award received from the Ministry
of Culture in 1998 ($5,000 equivalent) is also being used to fund
the project.
Objectives
The working group identified a need for training on four basic topics
in preventive conservation: environmental monitoring, microfilming
for preservation, remodeling and maintenance of facilities to improve
environmental conditions for collections, and preservation planning.
The working group established the following main objectives for
the project:
- to stimulate education and training in preventive conservation
- to facilitate networking and collective action by institutions
- to disseminate up-to-date literature on preservation and collections
management in Portuguese
- to provide technical support to Brazilian institutions for the
development and implementation of in-house preservation policies
and programs
To meet these objectives, the project was to focus on the following
activities:
- establishing a communications network among institutions for
exchanging information about preservation
- promoting the exchange of information through a dedicated Web
site and a bulletin
- compiling and maintaining an inventory and database about institutions
with library or archival holdings
- selecting, translating into Portuguese, and publishing relevant
technical documentation
- organizing staff and management training and other activities
in Brazil
- promoting research and development of preservation procedures
tailored to Brazilian institutions' needs
- encouraging the development of policy recommendations for preservation
in Brazil, such as preservation microfilming, digitizing, and using
acid-free paper
Brief Chronology
The project's first year, 1996, was focused on translating the preservation
literature into Portuguese. Selection of the documents to be translated
had begun in parallel with the final stages of the proposal preparation
(JuneDecember 1995) and was completed by March 1996.
Once document selection was complete, the working group turned its
attention to the design of the survey questionnaire and the collection
and compilation of address lists for the survey. Translation of the
first group of documents began in January 1996 and was completed
by March 1997.
In 1997, efforts focused on the following activities:
- printing an edition of 2,000 sets of 52 documents and producing
three videos in Portuguese, both completed by June 1997
- carrying out the survey, completed by December 1997
- launching core workshops organized by the working group in mid-year
to train the first 160 regional partners. Documents were distributed
first exclusively to the workshop participants and then, in September
and October, to all institutions that had responded to the survey.
Fig. 2. Project timetable, 19952000
The main activity in 1998 was a series of regional workshops organized
by partner institutions that would continue through 1999. A fourth
video was translated and produced in Portuguese, and the Web site
was prepared for its early 1999 launch. The working group met monthly
throughout the year to plan the project's second phase and held an
annual meeting at year's end.
A second, smaller, group of technical documents was selected in
late 1998 for translation and printing by mid-1999. A second series
of regional workshops on preservation planning was scheduled for
the second half of 1999, along with the production of new teaching
materials, including a video, for subsequent workshops and for distance
learning. Rather than holding a second annual meeting in 1999, the
working group decided to organize three new core workshops for the
active regional partners. The workshops were intended to broaden
their knowledge about preventive conservation, since many of the
partners located far from major centers have no other opportunities
for training and professional growth. The first workshop was held
in Campo Grande (state of Mato Grosso do Sul) in October 1999. The
other two workshops will be held in the Northeast and the South by
the end of 1999.
For 2000, the working group is planning to organize an international
conference in Rio to present the results of the project to a wider
audience and to discuss strategies for extending or replicating the
project in interested Latin American countries and in other Lusophone
countries.
Results
Two thousand sets of the original 52 titles were printed in Portuguese,
and all but about 200 have been distributed free of charge. About
3,600 individuals have attended 84 workshops held in 26 locations
in all five of Brazil's regions. The videos have been distributed
to 300 institutions and have been seen by about 3,000 staff members
in 500 institutions. Following the project's successful first phase
in 1998, it received the highest cultural heritage award presented
by Brazil's Ministry of Culture, the Rodrigo Melo Franco de Andrade.
The award included a $5,000 cash prize that has been invested in
the project's second phase.
More important than these quantifiable measures of success have
been the qualitative changes in attitudes, the new awareness of preservation,
and the growth of networking and communication among professionals
from the library and archival communities. For the first time, large
numbers of professionals have repeatedly come together to discuss
preservation-related issues. The process has created ever-widening
circles of knowledge and activity as the 160 participants in the
core workshops have returned to their home institutions to organize
regional workshops and lobby their colleagues for changes in policies,
procedures, and attitudes. Several participants have carried their
advocacy to other institutions, becoming roving ambassadors and missionaries
for the preservation message. In this way, the impact of the initial
investment has been multiplied many times over.
On a more concrete level, university professionals have begun to
incorporate preventive conservation into the archives and library
curricula.
- At the University of Rio de Janeiro, preventive conservation
has been added to the library and archival science curriculum by
the professor in charge, who was a participant in a core workshop.
His students have raised awareness of preservation in the institutions
where they are interns to the point where the classroom has become
a forum for the concerns of these institutions' collection managers.
- At Santa Catarina's Western University, a workshop participant
was invited to create a chair for preservation in the Department
of History.
- At the Federal University of Paraná State, two workshop
participants, including the head of the Librarianship Department,
created the first specialization program in paper conservation
in 1998.
- At the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul State in the South
and at the Federal University of Bahia State in the Northeast,
workshop participants are involved in preparing preservation curricula
for newly created courses in archival science.
Important physical changes have also been introduced at some institutions
as a direct result of the distribution of the preservation literature.
The Federal Ministry of Culture funded a program to rehouse photographic
archives held by the regional offices of the National Institute for
Historic and Artistic Heritage (IPHAN) in São Luiz. The archives,
comprising 12,000 photographic prints, 8,000 negatives, and 600 slides,
is the only collection of images of São Luis, a tropical island
and state capital that UNESCO designated a cultural heritage site
in 1997. Working from two articles translated and disseminated by
the project (Isoperms by Donald Sebera, and New Tools for
Preservation by James Reilly, Douglas W. Nishimura, and Edward
Zinn), the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the Federal University
of Santa Catarina developed Climus, an innovative computer-based
system for thermal monitoring of collections. The Climus system uses
the preservation index as a decision-making tool for timing the opening
and closing of windows and for turning on and off the mechanical
ventilation systems. This allows institutions located in the temperate
climate of southern Brazil to take advantage of the external environment.
In 1999, with support from Vitae, the National Archives installed
the Climus system to collect and manage data for a special climate-controlled
environment for the audiovisual collection. The record of changes
in the preservation index and the time-weighted preservation index
that Climus generated have provided important evidence to justify
the need to improve the air cooling and drying system for this collection.
Also in 1999, the Edgard Leuenroth Archives in São Paulo received
approval from the São Paulo State Foundation of Research and
Development for a project to improve the physical space and install
the Climus system. The preservation literature provided valuable
information for designing this project.
The working group hopes that the importance of environmental control
systems for collections preservation will be more widely discussed
as a result of the preservation environment workshop held in September
1999 in Curitiba. Three specialists from different institutions discussed
the Climus system at this event. The workshop presentations were
videotaped, and the tape will be disseminated as a new teaching aid.
| Brazil's Cultural
and Educational Infrastructure |
The centralized nature of Brazil's cultural and educational
public infrastructure lends itself to the kind of organized
action and communication required to overcome the challenges
of great distances, intemperate climates, and low budgets.
Administratively, the country is divided into five regions
and 27 states. Political and administrative authority was
decentralized during colonial times and in the century after
independence in 1822. There is, therefore, a long tradition
of municipal administrations operating independent of central
control. Since the 1930s, Brazil's federal government has
gradually centralized power in federal institutions and assumed
a leading role in setting standards and policy. However,
the states and municipal governments retain a great deal
of latitude in defining public policy.
Public universities, libraries, museums, and archives exist
at the federal, state, and municipal levels, with many archives
also attached to libraries or museums. Many of the national
institutions are located in Rio de Janeiro, the country's
political center until the 1960s. Outside Rio, many important
cultural institutions are associated with the state and federal
institutions (including universities), such as the Amazon
Museum in Manaus and the Emilio Goeldi Museum in Belém,
which houses one of the richest natural science collections
in the world. At the State University of Campinas, the Edgard
Leuenroth Archives houses extensive documentation on the
social and political history of Brazil.
The National Library and National Archives are both located
in Rio. The National Library of Brazil was created in 1808
with donations from the royal family, when the intended King
John VI of Portugal decided to transfer the Portuguese court
to Brazil. With eight million works, it is the eighth largest
library in the world and the largest in Latin America. Maps,
photographs, sound recordings, and rare books are the heart
of this library's treasure.
The National Archives was created in 1838 to house, organize,
preserve, give access to, and disseminate knowledge about
the country's documentary heritage, and also to implement
the federal government's archival policies. It houses government
administrative materials and gifts from private institutions,
including about 45,000 linear meters of documents, 55,000
maps and drawings, 13,000 magnetic audio tapes, and 12,000
films and video tapes. The National Archives also serves
as the head of the National Council of Archives, which implements
federal archival policy.
Many of the national museums are also located in Rio, such
as the National Museum of Fine Arts, the National Museum
of History, and the Museum of the Republic. Most of these
belong to the National Institute for Historic and Artistic
Heritage, which also has 15 regional offices and whose members
include 30 other important museums located throughout the
country. The National Foundation of Art (Funarte), also located
in Rio, houses a Documentation Center with more than one
million items, including books, magazines, photographs, sound
recordings, and posters. The collection is especially rich
in the areas of music and theater and includes manuscripts
of Brazilian composers, original stage set drawings, and
unpublished plays.
At the state level, there are both public and private collections
of note. Brazil's state assemblies have broad authority to
develop legislation regarding state archival systems, usually
inspired by federal legislation. Secretaries of culture oversee
most cultural institutions at the state and municipal levels.
The situation is different for archives, which are overseen
in part by the secretaries of justice or administration.
One of the most important federal institutions at the state
level is the Joaquim Nabuco Foundation in Recife, capital
of Pernambuco State in the Northeast. The foundation houses
a variety of private historical and political collections
and two museums, and is also a member of IPHAN. Another important
private institution is the Getulio Vargas Foundation's Research
and Documentation Center of Contemporary History of Brazil,
created in 1973. It houses documents related to political
figures from the 1930s Vargas era. |
Next Previous
Return to CLIR Home Page >> |