American Library Association. RUSA. BRASS Education Committee. 2000. Best of the Business Web Sites. Available at http://www.ala.org/rusa/brass/besthome.html.
American Library Association. MARS. Best of Free Reference Web Sites. 1999. Available at http://www.ala.org/rusa/mars/best1999.html.
American Library Association. ALSC. Children and Technology Committee. 1997. Selection Criteria: How to tell if you are Looking at a Great Web Site. Available at http://www.ala.org/PrinterTemplate.cfm?Section=greatwebsitesforkids&Template=/ContentManagement/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=127895.
Arms, William Y. 2001. A Report to the Library of Congress: Web Preservation Project, Interim Report. Cornell University. Available at http://www.cs.cornell.edu./wya/LC-web/.
Arms, William Y. Collecting and Preserving Open-Access Materials on the Web: A Proposal to the Library of Congress from Cornell University. Unpublished report.
Baruth, Barbara. 2000. Is Your Catalogue Big Enough to Handle the Web? American Libraries 31(August):56-60.
Campbell, Jerry. 2000. The Case for Creating a Scholars Portal to the Web: A White Paper. ARL Newsletter, issue 211. Available at http://www.arl.org/newsltr/211/portal.html.
Caywood, Carolyn. 1996. Selection Criteria for World Wide Web Resources. Public Libraries 60 (Summer):169.
Chisholm, Wendy, Gregg Vanderheiden, and Ian Jacobs, eds. 1999. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (May 5). World Wide Web Consortium. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/.
DESIRE. Selection Criteria for Quality Controlled Information Gateways. Available at http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/desire/quality/toc.html.
DESIRE Information Gateways Handbook. Available at http://www.desire.org/handbook/.
Digital Asia Library (DAL). Available at http://digitalasia.library.wisc.edu.
Dublin Core. Available at http://dublincore.org/.
DutchESS. Dutch Electronic Subject Service. Available at http://www.kb.nl/dutchess.
Fedunok, Suzanne. 1996. Hammurabi and the Electronic Age: Documenting Electronic Collection Decisions. RQ 36(1):86-90.
HealthWeb. Selection Methodology and Guidelines. Available at http://healthweb.org/guidelines.cfm.
Humbul Humanities Hub. Describing and Cataloging Resources in Humbul. Available at http://www.humbul.ac.uk/about/catalogue.html.
IMesh: International Collaboration on the Internet Subject Gateways. Available at http://www.desire.org/html/subjectgateways/community/imesh/.
IMesh Toolkit. 2000. What is a Subject Gateway? Available at http://clark.cs.wisc.edu/imeshtk/.
Internet Scout Project. Available at http://www.scout.cs.wisc.edu.
Jennings, Simon. 2000. RDN Collections Development Framework. Version 1.1 (May). Available at http://www.rdn.ac.uk/publications/policy.html.
Kirriemuir, John. 1999. A Brief Survey of Quality Resource Discovery Systems. (Version 2, September). Available at http://www.rdn.ac.uk/publications/studies/survey/.
Koch, Traugott. 2000. Cross-Browsing in Renardus: Usage of Vocabularies in Renardus Gateways. Available at http://www.lub.lu.se/renardus/class.html.
Kuopio University Library Group. 1996. Selection Criteria for Virtual Libraries. Available at http://www.jyu.fi/library/virtuaalikirjasto/help/criteria.htm.
Lagoze, Carl, and David Fielding. 1998. Defining Collections in Distributed Digital Libraries. D-Lib Magazine (November). Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november98/lagoze/11lagoze.html.
Librarians’ Index to the Internet. Selection Criteria for Adding Resources to the LII. Available at http://www.lii.org/search/file/pubcriteria.
Library of Congress. BEOline: Selection Criteria for Resources to be Included in the BEOnline+ Project. Available at http://lcweb.loc.gov/rr/business/beonline/beonsel.html.
Library of Congress. Minerva: Mapping the Internet Electronic Resources Virtual Archive. Unpublished report.
MacCall, Steven L., Ana D. Cleveland, and Ian E. Gibson. 1999. Outline and Preliminary Evaluation of the Classical Digital Library Model. In Knowledge, Creation, Organization, and Use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Washington, D.C., October 31-November 4, 1999: Medford, N.J.: Information Today.
McGeachin, Robert. 1998. Selection Criteria for Web-Based Resources in a Science and Technology Library Collection. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 18 (Spring). Available at http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/98-spring/article2.html.
MedWeb. Guidelines for Inclusion of Sites in MedWeb. Available at http://www.medweb.emory.edu/MedWeb/history.htm.
National Library of Australia. Pandora Project. Available at http://pandora.nla.gov.au/.
Oard, Doug W. 2000. Cross-Language Information Retrieval Resources (Overview) [last modified Nov. 24]. Available at http://www.ee.umd.edu/medlab/mlir/.
Peters, Carol, and Costantino Thanos. 2000. DELOS: A Network of Excellence for Digital Libraries; Promoting and Sustaining Digital Library Research and Applications in Europe. Cultivate Interactive 1 (July). Available at http://www.cultivate-int.org/issue1/delos/.
Platform for Internet Content Selection (PICS). Available at http://www.w3c.org/PICS.
Powell, Andy. 2000. RDN Terminology, Version 1.0. Available at http://www.rdn.ac.uk/publications/terminology/.
Pratt, Gregory F. 1996. Guidelines for Internet Resources Selection. College & Research Libraries News 3 (March):134-135.
Resource Description Framework (RDF). Available at http://www.w3org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax.
Resource Discovery Network. RDN Policy and Guidelines. Available at http://www.rdn.ac.uk/publications/policy.html.
Resource Organization And Discovery in Subject-based services (ROADS). ROADS Harvester software development. Available at http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/software-tools/.
Royal Library of Sweden. Kulturarw3 Heritage Project. Available at http://kulturarw3.kb.se/html/kulturarw3.eng.html.
Scout Report. Selection Criteria. Available at http://scout.cs.wisc.edu/.
SOSIG: Social Science Information Gateway. Available at http://sosig.ac.uk/.
Sowards, Steven W. A Typology for Ready Reference Web Sites in Libraries. firstmonday Peer-Reviewed Journal of the Internet. Available at http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_5/sowards/index.html.
Sweetland, James H. 2000. Reviewing the World Wide Web Theory versus Reality. Library Trends 48(4):748-768.
Thomas, Sarah. 2000. Abundance, Attention, and Access: of Portals and Catalogs. ARL Newsletter 212. Also available at http://www.arl.org/newsltr/212/portal.html.
UKOLN. The UK Office for Library and Information Networking. Available at http://ukoln.bath.ac.uk/.
University of Virginia Libraries. 1998. Ad Hoc Committee on Digital Access. Final Report. Approved June 15, 1998.
Waddell, Cynthia D. 1998. Applying the ADA to the Internet: A Web Accessibility Standard. Available at http://www.rit.edu/~easi/law/weblaw1.htm.
Wells, Amy Tracy, Susan Calcari, and Travis Koplow. 1999. The Amazing Internet Challenge: How Leading Projects Use Library Skills to Organize the Web. Chicago: American Library Association.
WWW-vlib. Summary of Selection Criteria. Available at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-vlib/msg00276.html.
Additional Sources of Information
Agriculture Network Information Center. Available at http://www.agnic.org/.
Argus Clearinghouse. Mission. Available at http://www.clearinghouse.net/mission.html.
Cooperative Online Resource Catalog (CORC). Available at http://www.oclc.org/corc/.
DESIRE. Development of a European Service for Information on Research and Education. EU Project. Available at http://www.lub.lu.se/desire/desireIndex.html.
Engineering Electronic Library, Sweden. Available at http://eels.lub.lu.se.
European Libraries and Electronic Resources in Mathematical Sciences. The Euler Project. Available at http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/projects/EULER/.
Internet Archive. Available at http://www.archive.org.
Renardus: The Clever Route to Information. Available at http://www.renardus.org.
WWW-VL History. Available at http://ukans.edu/history/VL/.
