|

Managing Digital Assets:
Reading List
The following selection offers some readingsfor both
before and after the eventin the various topics and
issues that will come up during the workshop. All
the links were accessed on January 13, 2005.
Overview of Content and Technology Issues
Atkins, Daniel E., et al. Revolutionizing Science and Engineering
Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science
Foundation Blue Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure.
January 2003. http://www.communitytechnology.org/nsf_ci_report/
OCLC. 2003 Environmental Scan: A Report to the OCLC Membership. http://www.oclc.org/membership/escan/research/default.htm
Seaman, David. "Deep Sharing: A Case for the Federated Digital
Library." EDUCAUSE Review (July/August 2003): 10-11. http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0348.pdf
Unsworth, John, et al. Commission on Cyberinfrastructure
for the Humanities & Social Sciences . 2004-2005. http://www.acls.org./cyberinfrastructure/cyber.htm
Waters, Donald J. "Beyond Digital Libraries: The Organizational
Design of a New Cyberinfrastructure." Wave of the Future:
NSF Post Digital Library Futures Workshop, June 15-17 2003,
Chatham, MA. http://www.sis.pitt.edu/~dlwkshop/paper_waters.html
Creation and Procurement of Digital Information
Evidence of a trend towards mass digitization on a scale of
ambition hitherto unseen:
Bishoff, Liz and Nancy Allen. Business Planning for Cultural
HeritageInstitutions. Washington, D.C.:
Council on Library and Information Resoures, 2004.Abstract
is available from http://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract/pub124abst.html
Caplan, Priscilla, et al. Report of the Workshop
on Opportunities for Research on the Creation, Management,
Preservation and Use of Digital Content . Gainesville,
FL: University of Florida, Florida Center for Library Automation,
2003. http://www.imls.gov/pubs/pdf/digitalopp.pdf
Institute for Museum and Library Services. A Framework
of Guidance for Building Good Digital Collections. Washington,
D.C.: IMLS, 2001. http://www.imls.gov/pubs/forumframework.htm
Jennings, Simon. RDN Collections Development Framework.
Version 1.2 (July 2002). http://www.rdn.ac.uk/publications/collections/cdframework3.doc .
Open Access/Self-Archiving
Special Issue: Open Access 2004. Serials Review Vol.
30 No. 4. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00987913
- Thirteen articles from some of the most active commentators
on Open Access issues. This Elsevier journal is itself available
through open access, by permission of the publisher.
Harnad, Stephan, et al. "The Access/Impact Problem and the
Green and Gold Roads to Open Access." Serials Review 30,
no. 4 (2004). http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Temp/impact.html
LIBLICENSE Project. LIBLICENSE: Licensing Digital Materials. http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/index.shtml.
- The listserv archives of the LIBLICENSE Project discussion
list offer a series of running e-mail conversations and debates
around a host of licensing and open access issues and business
implications. Most journals now allow public-access self-archiving
-- they allow authors to put the final version of their scholarly
articles on their own home page or in their institutional
repository, and provide free access to them. For example
of this see, "Elsevier Further Liberalizes Copyright for
Authors," available from http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authored_newsitem.cws_home/companynews05_00145.
SPARC http://www.arl.org/sparc/ .
- This ARL initiative has a good deal of background information
on this topic.
Management of Licenses and Rights
Coyle, Karen. "Rights Management and Digital Library Requirements." Ariadne
Magazine, issue 40, July, 2004. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue40/coyle/
Jewell, Timothy D., et al. Electronic Resource Management:
The Report of the DLF Initiative. Washington, D.C.: DLF,
2004. http://www.diglib.org/standards/dlf-erm02.htm
- A common, sharable, XML "record" and set of recommendations
for recording the content of license agreements, related
administrative information, and internal processes associated
with collections of licensed electronic resources. Library
system vendors and the publishing community are reacting
very favorably to this emerging protocol.
Organization/Description Topics
Open Archives Initiative, http://www.openarchives.org.
- This Web site gives a good overview of the notion of shareable,
harvestable metadata, which is relatively easy for archives
and libraries to produce and can then be gathered up by "harvesters" and
turned into services. For examples and discussions, see the
following:
Arms, Caroline R. "Available and Useful: OAI at the Library
of Congress." Library Hi Tech 21, no. 2 (2003): 129-139.
Dempsey, Lorcan, Eric Childress, Carol Jean Godby, Thomas B. Hickey, Diane Vizine-Goetz, and Jeff Young. 2004.
"Metadata Switch: Thinking About Some Metadata Management and Knowledge Organization Issues in the Changing Research and Learning Landscape."
Forthcoming in LITA Guide to E-Scholarship [working title],
ed. Debra Shapiro. August 2004 preprint available at
http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/archive/2004/dempsey-mslitaguide.pdf (PDF:847K/25pp).
OAIster: http://www.oaister.org
- [4,879,071 searchable OAI records describing online resources
from 396 institutions, many of them libraries, archives,
and museums as of January 2005.
Authentication and Access Control
Shibboleth Project, Internet2 Middleware. http://shibboleth.internet2.edu.
Ann Arbor, MI: Internet2, 2005.
- Shibboleth is "developing architectures, policy structures,
practical technologies, and an open source implementation
to support inter-institutional sharing of web resources subject
to access controls." You can think of it as a replacement
for the clumsy IP access control that we now use, as long
as both library and vendor support Shibboleth. It is an access
control that pays a high degree of attention to the privacy
of the users, and at enabling richer, fuller, easier use
of that content we hold under licenses that restrict its
access to certain sets of users.
Curation/Preservation
Friedlander, Amy. "The National Digital Information Infrastructure
Preservation Program: Expectations, Realities, Choices and
Progress to Date." D-Lib Magazine 8, no. 4 (April 2002). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april02/friedlander/04friedlander.html.
National Digital Information Infrastructure Preservation Program. Welcome
to the NDIIPP. http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/.
Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress.
Lavoie, Brian, and Lorcan Dempsey. "Thirteen Ways of Looking at…Digital Preservation." D-Lib Magazine, July/August, 2004.
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july04/lavoie/07lavoie.html
"Information and recommendations of the Digital Preservation group at the University of Kansas in the High Velocity Change through High Volume Collaboration project."
http://www.ku.edu/~hvc2/digitalpreservation.shtml
There is much digital preservation activity internationally.
For a sampling of this please see the following:
- Beagrie, Neil. National Digital Preservation Initiatives:
An Overview of Developments in Australia, France, the
Netherlands, and the United Kingdom and of Related International
Activity. Washington, DC: Council on Library and
Information Resources, 2003. http://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract/pub116abst.html.
- Jones, Maggie. "Digital Preservation Activities in the
U.K. -- Building the Infrastructure." Paper delivered at
World Library & Information Congress, 69th IFLA
General Conference and Council, Berlin, Germany, August
1-9, 2003.
http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla69/papers/129e-Jones.pdf.
- Digital Curation Centre (UK): DCC. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/.
- PADI: Preserving Access to Digital Information (National
Library of Australia), http://www.nla.gov.au/padi/index.html.
Institutional Repositories
Atwood, Sally. "MIT'Superarchive." Technology Review (December
2002/January 2003). http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/02/12/atwood1202.asp.
Crow, Raym. The Case for Institutional Repositories: A
SPARC Position Paper. Washington, D.C.: Scholarly Publishing & Academic
Resources Coalition, 2002.
http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/ir.html.
Foster, Nancy Fried, and Susan Gibbons. "Understanding Faculty to Improve Content Recruitment for Institutional Repositories." D-Lib Magazine, January, 2005.
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january05/foster/01foster.html
Fyffe, Richard, and Beth Warner. "Scholarly Communicaiton in a Digital World: The Role of an Institutional Respository." March, 2003. In KUScholarWorks, University of Kansas.
http://hdl.handle.net/1808/126
DSpace Federation, http://www.dspace.org .
Flecker, Dale, Neil McLean, co-chairs, et al. Digital Library
Content and Course Management Systems: Issues of Interoperation.
Report. Washington, D.C.: DLF, 2004.
http://www.diglib.org/pubs/cmsdl0407.
- This is an excellent summary of the issues facing users
and designers of Course Management Systems as they work with
content in repositories of a variety of types.
Gehl, John, ed. "Check out the New Library." Interview with
Clifford Lynch.
Ubiquity, Volume 4, no. 23 (July 30-August 5, 2003).
http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/interviews/pf/c_lynch_1.html
User Needs and Tools
Carver, Larry, Sarah Pritchard, principal investigators. Campus
Informatics: Collaboration for Knowledge Management.
Draft. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California, Santa
Barbara, University Libraries, 2004. http://www.library.ucsb.edu/informatics/.
- This is a Mellon-funded study on faculty needs and practices
surrounding innovative, data-intensive research and scholarship.
DLF/Outsell, Inc. Dimensions and Use of the Scholarly Information
Environment. Introduction by Amy Friedlander. Washington,
D.C.: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2002. http://www.diglib.org/pubs/scholinfo/.
George Mason University's Center for History and New Media's
Echo: Exploring & Collecting HIstory Online toolkit, http://echo.gmu.edu.
Greenstone Digital Library Software, http://www.greenstone.org .
- An innovative, free, open-source, and increasingly standards-aware "digital-library-in-a-box" software
suite from New Zealand. Also very useful as a personal library
tool for a student or scholar.
Institute of Museum and Library Services. Assessment of
End-User Needs in IMLS-Funded Digitization Projects.
Washington, D.C.: IMLS, 2003. http://www.imls.gov/pubs/pdf/userneedsassessment.pdf.
- An IMLS commissioned study of the needs-assessment practices
used in digitization projects.
Michigan State University's MATRIX. The Center for Humane
Arts, Letters, and Social Sciences Online tools, http://matrix.msu.edu/index.php.
Seaman, David. DLF Scholars' Panel. Report. Washington,
D.C.: DLF, 2004. http://www.diglib.org/use/scholars0406.
- A report from a 2-day meeting to learn from working scholars
what they value and what they need from our digital library
services.
Smith, Abby. New-Model Scholarship: How Will It Survive? Washington
DC: Council on Library & Information Resources, 2003. http://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract/pub114abst.html.
UC Berkeley's Interactive University Project Scholar's Box
suite, http://interactiveu.berkeley.edu:8000/IU/SB.
|