|
Copyright 2003 by the Council on Library and Information Resources. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transcribed in any form without permission of the publisher. Requests for reproduction should be submitted to the Director of Communications at the Council on Library and Information Resources.
Contents
Part II: Review of Digital Cultural Heritage Initiatives
Part III: Review of Funders of Digital Cultural Heritage Initiatives
Appendixes
About the AuthorDiane M. Zorich is an information management consultant for cultural organizations. She specializes in planning and managing the delivery of cultural information over digital networks. Her clients include the J. Paul Getty Trust, The Huntington Art Library, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the American Association of Museums, and many other cultural organizations and institutions. Before establishing her consultancy, Ms. Zorich was data manager at the Association of Systematics Collections in Washington, D.C., and documentation manager at the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology at Harvard University. She served as past president and Board member of the Museum Computer Network, and currently serves as chair of that organization's Intellectual Property Special Interest Group. Ms. Zorich has published and lectured extensively on issues related to network access to cultural information. She is the author of Introduction to Managing Digital Assets: Options for Cultural and Educational Organizations (1999, The J. Paul Getty Trust), and was project manager for the publication A Museum Guide to Copyright and Trademark (1999, American Association of Museums). Her forthcoming publication, Developing Intellectual Property Policies: A Guide for Museums (Canadian Heritage Information Network/National Initiative for a Networked Cultural Heritage) will be out in fall 2003.
AcknowledgmentsMy sincere thanks to the members of the National Review Steering Committee, particularly Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR) President Deanna Marcum, for assistance in all phases of this project. Thanks are also due to Cynthia Burns and Melanie Kamm of CLIR for facilitating contacts and follow-up tasks between CLIR, the author, and survey participants. I am also grateful to Ann Schneider for discussions about the Getty Los Angeles Electronic Cataloguing Initiative and to John Unsworth, Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities, and to the participants of the Allied Digital Humanities Organizations Committee (ADHOC), who allowed me access to their closed discussion list. Finally, my deepest thanks to the 38 individuals who participated in this survey on behalf of their organizations.
PrefaceNearly every organization whose mission includes promoting access to information is well aware of the value of digital collections. To cultural organizations and funders alike, the prospect of making collections available to new and distant audiences is compelling. Digital technology is finding its way into cultural organizations, and it offers great promise for enhancing access. However, digitization efforts, despite everyone's good intentions, rise and fall on the waves of external funding. New organizations have been created to promote and manage a growing number of digital initiatives. Some traditional organizations have added projects to accommodate the digital agenda, but they often treat these projects as special initiatives, rather than long-term programs that will require an ongoing commitment of funding, staffing, and time. The economic downturn has increased the vulnerability of many digital programs, especially those run by very small organizations that lack the human or financial resource cushion to sustain "add-on" programs. The Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR) has been watching these developments with concern. After Charles Henry, of Rice University, and Stanley Katz, of Princeton University, developed a working paper, American Cultural Heritage Initiatives: A National Review, which called for a detailed study of the situation, CLIR decided to support a study that would explore how the many small cultural organizations that have been launched in recent years will be sustained. CLIR commissioned museum consultant Diane Zorich to conduct the study. A steering committee composed of Charles Henry, Stanley Katz, Samuel Sachs, Patricia Williams, and Deanna Marcum provided guidance and advice throughout the study. We believe the work presented here will be invaluable to all cultural organizations as they struggle to find the rightful place for digital initiatives in their agendas. We hope that funding agencies will also find the study useful. Deanna B. Marcum
Acronyms AAUP American
Association of University Presses
|
|||