Close this search box.
Close this search box.

Anderson, Rick, and Steven D. Zink. 2003. Implementing the Unthinkable: The Demise of Periodical Check-in at the University of Nevada. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services 27: 61-71.

Bowen, William G. 2001. At a Slight Angle to the Universe: The University in a Digitized, Commercialized Age. Princeton. N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Chrzastowski, Tina E. 2003. Making the Transition from Print to Electronic Serials: A New Model for Academic Chemistry Libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54(12).

Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, and Stephen R. Lawrence. 2003. Comparing Library Resource Allocations for the Paper and the Digital Library: An Exploratory Study. D-Lib Magazine 9(12). Available at

Dillon, Irma F., and Karla L. Hahn. 2002. Are Readers Ready for the Electronic-Only Journal Collection? Results of a Survey at the University of Maryland. portal: Libraries and the Academy 2(3): 375-390.

Ekman, Richard, and Richard E. Quandt. 1999. Technology and Scholarly Communication. Berkeley: University of California Press in association with The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.

Frazier, Kenneth. 2001. The Librarians’ Dilemma: Contemplating the Costs of the ÔBig Deal.’ D-Lib Magazine 8(3). Available at

Friedlander, Amy. 2002. Dimensions and Use of the Scholarly Information Environment. Washington, D.C.: Digital Library Federation and Council on Library and Information Resources.

Guthrie, Kevin. 2001. What Do Faculty Think About Electronic Resources? American Library Association Annual Conference Participants’ Meeting, Summer 2001. Available at

Guthrie, Kevin, and Roger C. Schonfeld. 2004. What Faculty Think of Electronic Resources: 2003. Coalition for Networked Information Task Force Meeting, April 2004. Available at

Ingenta Institute. 2002. The Consortium Site Licence: Is It a Sustainable Model? Oxford: Ingenta Institute.

International Coalition of Library Consortia. 2001. Statement of Current Perspective and Preferred Practices for the Selection and Purchase of Electronic Information. Available at

King, Donald W., Sarah Aerni, Fern Brody, and Matt Herbison. 2004. Comparative Cost of the University of Pittsburgh Electronic & Print Library Collections. Available at

King, Donald W., Peter B. Boyce, Carol Hansen Montgomery, and Carol Tenopir. 2003a. Library Economic Metrics: Examples of the Comparison of Electronic and Print Journal Collections and Collection Services. Library Trends 51(3): 276-300.

King, Donald W., Carol Tenopir, Carol Hansen Montgomery, and Sarah E. Aerni. 2003b. Patterns of Journal Use by Faculty at Three Diverse Universities. D-Lib Magazine 9(10).

Lawrence, Stephen R., Lynn Silipigni Connaway, and Keith H. Brigham. 2001. Life Cycle Costs of Library Collections: Creation of Effective Performance and Cost Metrics for Library Resources. College & Research Libraries 62(6): 541-553.

Leighton, Philip D., and David C. Weber. 1986. Planning Academic and Research Library Buildings. 2nd Edition. Chicago: American Library Association.

Lin, Lewis G. 2003. The Cost Function and Scale Economies in Academic Research Libraries. Library Trends 51(3): 293-311.

McDonald, John. 2003. “No One Uses Them So Why Should We Keep Them?”- Scenarios for Print Issue Retention. Against the Grain 15(2): 22-24.

Montgomery, Carol Hansen. 2000. Measuring the Impact of an Electronic Journal Collection on Library Costs: A Framework and Preliminary Observations. D-Lib Magazine 6(10). Available at

Montgomery, Carol Hansen. 2002. Print to Electronic: Measuring the Operational and Economic Implications of an Electronic Journal Collection. Learned Publishing 15: 129-136.

Montgomery, Carol Hansen, and Donald W. King. 2002. Comparing Library and User Related Costs of Print and Electronic Journal Collections: A First Step Towards a Comprehensive Analysis. D-Lib Magazine 8(10). Available at

Montgomery, Carol Hansen, and JoAnne L. Sparks. 2000. The Transition to an Electronic Journal Collection: Managing the Organizational Changes at Drexel University. Serials Review 26(3): 4-18. Available at

Nitecki, Danuta A., and Curtis L. Kendrick. 2001. Library Off-Site Shelving: Guide for High-Density Facilities. Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.

Quandt, Richard E. 2003. Scholarly Materials: Paper or Digital? Library Trends 51(3): 349-375.

Reilly, Bernard F. Jr. 2003. Developing Print Repositories: Models for Shared Preservation and Access. Washington, D.C.: Council on Library and Information Resources. Available at

Schonfeld, Roger C. 2003. JSTOR: A History. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Schonfeld, Roger C., Donald W. King, Ann Okerson, and Eileen Gifford Fenton. 2004. Library Periodicals Expenses: Comparison of Non-Subscription Costs of Print and Electronic Formats on a Life-Cycle Basis. D-Lib Magazine 10(1). Available at

Shenton, Helen. 2003. Life Cycle Collection Management. LIBER Quarterly 13(3/4). Available at

Stephens, Andy. 1988. The Application of Life Cycle Costing in Libraries. British Journal of Academic Librarianship 3(2): 32-38.

Stephens, Andy. 1994. The Application of Life Cycle Costing in Libraries: A Case Study Based on Acquisition and Retention of Library Materials in the British Library. IFLA Journal 20(2): 130-140.

Streatfield, Rosemary, and Cindy Stewart King. 2003. It’s a Wrap (Part I): Coping with a Binding Budget Cut by Using Shrinkwrap as a Storage Alternative for Serials. The Serials Librarian 43(3): 59-70.

Withers, Rob. 2003. Biz of Acq-Thinking Outside the Building: When, Why, and How Libraries Provide Access to Journals through Electronic Titles and Storage Facilities Instead of Hard Copies. Against the Grain 15(3): 92-96.


Skip to content