Web site addresses were valid as of July 20, 2001.

Albanese, A. 2000. AAPA Negotiates Wiley Journal Price Cut! Library Journal Academic Newswire (Sept. 12).

Anderson, Rick. 2000. Is the Digital Archive a New Beast Entirely? Serials Review 26(3):50-52.

Barber, David. 2000. Internet-Accessible Full-Text Electronic Journal and Periodical Collections for Libraries. Library Technology Reports 36(5).

Bleiler, Richard, and Terry Plum. 1999. Networked Information Resources. SPEC Kit 253 (December). Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries.

Blixrud, Julia C. 2000. Establishing A Role For Research Libraries In Learning Outcomes Assessment Programs. ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 213 (December):1.

Boyce, Peter B. 2000. Who Will Keep the Archives? Wrong Question! Serials Review 26(3): 52-55.

Brand, Amy. 2001. CrossRef Turns One. D-Lib Magazine 7(5). Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may01/brand/05brand.html.

California Digital Library. 1996. CDC Principles for Acquiring and Licensing Information in Digital Formats. Available at http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/Info/principles.html.

California Digital Library. 1997. CDL Collection Framework. Available at http://www.cdlib.org/libstaff/sharedcoll/docs/framework.pdf.

California Digital Library. 1999a. Joint Steering Committee Criteria for Priority Selection. Available at http://www.cdlib.org/libstaff/sharedcoll/jsc/PriorityPoints.rtf.

California Digital Library. 1999b. Database Selection Criteria. Available at http://www.cdlib.org/libstaff/system_services/tswg/database_selection_criteria.rtf.

California Digital Library. 1999c. Tiered Approach for Access to Purchased Electronic Content. Available at http://www.cdlib.org/libstaff/sharedcoll/docs/tiers.rtf.

California Digital Library. 1999d. Tier 2 Acquisitions Procedures. Available at http://www.cdlib.org/libstaff/sharedcoll/toolkit/cdltier2.rtf.

California Digital Library. 1999e. Resource Liaisons Charge. Available at http://www.cdlib.org/libstaff/sharedcoll/liaisons/charge.rtf.

California Digital Library. 1999f. Resource Liaisons and Usage Statistics. Available at http://www.cdlib.org/libstaff/sharedcoll/liaisons/UsageStatistics_Goals.rtf.

California Digital Library. 2000a. CDL Acquisitions Procedures. Available at http://www.cdlib.org/libstaff/sharedcoll/docs/acquisitions_proc.rtf.

California Digital Library. 2000b. Checklist of Points to be Addressed in a California Digital Library License Agreement. Available at http://www.cdlib.org/libstaff/sharedcoll/docs/checklist.pdf.

California Digital Library. 2000c. Resource Liaisons. Available at http://www.cdlib.org/libstaff/sharedcoll/liaisons/.

California Digital Library. 2000d. Resource Selection/Evaluation Criteria. Available at http://www.cdlib.org/libstaff/system_services/tswg/Database_Selection_Criteria_v4.rtf.

California Digital Library. 2000e. Standard License Agreement. Available at http://www.cdlib.org/libstaff/sharedcoll/toolkit/CDLModelLicense1-12-00.rtf.

California Digital Library 2000f. CDL User Guides. Available at http://www.cdlib.org/guides/.

California Digital Library. 2000g. MyLibrary@CDL Release Notes. Available at http://www.cdlib.org/libstaff/july2000/mylibrary/.

Campbell, Jerry. 2000. The Case for Creating a Scholars’ Portal to the Web: A White Paper. Available at http://arl.cni.org/newsltr/211/portal.html.

Carnegie Mellon University Libraries. 1999. Digital Library Plan 2000-2007: Supplement to the 1998 Strategic Plan. Available at http://www.library.cmu.edu/Libraries/digitallibrary.pdf.

Case, Mary M. 2001. Capitalizing on Competition: The Economic Underpinnings of SPARC. Available at http://www.arl.org/sparc/core/index.asp?page=f41.

Center for Institutional Cooperation. 1999. Standardized Agreement Language. Available at http://www.cic.uiuc.edu/cli/contracts/standardized_agreement_language.htm.

Chudnov, Daniel, Cynthia Crooker, and Kimberly Parker. 2000. jake: Overview and Status Report. Serials Review 26(4):12-17.

Cohen, Suzanne et al. 2000. MyLibrary: Personalized Electronic Services in the Cornell University Library. D-Lib Magazine. 6(4). Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april00/mistlebauer/04mistlebauer.html.

Cornell University Libraries. MyLibrary@Cornell. Available at http://mylibrary.cornell.edu/.

Cornell University Libraries. 1999. CORC at Cornell: Final Report. Available at http://campusgw.library.cornell.edu/corc/.

Cornell University Libraries. 2000. Cornell University Library Digital Futures Plan: July 2000 to June 2002. Available at http://www.library.cornell.edu/staffweb/CULDigitalFuturesPlan.html.

Council on Library and Information Resources. 2001. CLIR/DLF Model License. Available at http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/modlic.shtml.

Cox, John. 2000. Model Generic Licenses: Cooperation and Competition. Serials Review 26(1): 3-9.

Curtis, Donnelyn, Virginia M. Scheschy, and Adolfo R. Tarango. 2000. Developing and Managing Electronic Journal Collections: A How-To-Do-It Manual for Librarians. N.Y.: Neal-Schuman.

Demas, Sam. 1994. Collection Development for the Electronic Library: a Conceptual and Organizational Model. Library Hi Tech 12(3):71-80.

Demas, S. G., P. McDonald, and G. Lawrence. 1995. The Internet and Collection Development: Mainstreaming Selection of Internet Resources. Library Resources and Technical Services 39(3):275-290.

Digital Library Federation. 2001. Preservation of Electronic Scholarly Journals. Available http://www.diglib.org/preserve/presjour.htm.

Douglas, Kimberly. 2000. Digital Archiving in the Context of Cultural Change. Serials Review 26(3):55-59.

Duranceau, Ellen Finnie. 2000a. License Compliance. Serials Review 26(1):53-58.

Duranceau, Ellen Finnie. 2000b. License Tracking. Serials Review 26(3):69-73.

Frazier, Kenneth. 2001. The Librarians’ Dilemma: Contemplating the Costs of the “Big Deal.” D-Lib Magazine 7:3. Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march01/frazier/03frazier.html.

Ghaphery, Jimmy, and Dan Ream. 2000. VCU’s My Library: Librarians Love It . . . Users? Well, Maybe. Information Technology and Libraries 19(4)186-190.

Graham, Rebecca A. 2000. Evolution of Archiving in the Digital Age. Serials Review 26(3):59-62.

Harvard University Library. 1999. Committee on Electronic Reference Service (COERS). Available at http://hul.harvard.edu/cmtes/ulc/coers.

Harvard University Library. 2000a. Licensing Electronic Resources at Harvard University: Guidelines for Vendors. Available at http://hul.harvard.edu/ldi/resources/vendor_guidelines.pdf.

Harvard University Library. 2000b. Resource Stewardship Program. Available at http://hul.harvard.edu/digacq/stewards.html.

Harvard University Library. 2000c. Responsibilities of Stewards and Coordinators. Available at http://hul.harvard.edu/cmtes/ulc/coers/stewards_coordinators.htm.

Harvard University Library. 2000d. HOLLIS and HOLLIS Plus Fiscal Year 2000 Statistics. Available at http://hul.harvard.edu/ois/services/reporting/stats/YR2000/.

Harvard University Library. 2000e. Re-evaluation of Digital Resources. Available at http://hul.harvard.edu/cmtes/ulc/coers/Re-evaluation1.htm.

Hennig, Nicole. 2001. Improving Access to E-journals and Databases at the MIT Libraries: Building a Database-backed Web Site Called “VERA.” Available at http://www.hennigweb.com/publications/vera.html.

Hughes, Carol Ann. 2000. Information Services for Higher Education: A New Competitive Space. D-Lib Magazine 6(12). Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december00/hughes/12hughes.html.

Hunter, Karen. 2000. Digital Archiving. Serials Review 26(3):62-64.

International Coalition of Library Consortia. 1998a. Statement of Current Perspective and Preferred Practices for the Selection and Purchase of Electronic Information. Available at http://www.library.yale.edu/consortia/statement.html.

International Coalition of Library Consortia. 1998b. Guidelines for Statistical Measures of Usage of Web-based Indexed, Abstracted, and Full-Text Resources. Available at http://www.library.yale.edu/consortia/webstats.html.

International Coalition of Library Consortia. 1999. Guidelines for Technical Issues in Request for Proposal Requirements and Contract Negotiations. Available at http://www.library.yale.edu/consortia/techreq.html.

Jewell, Timothy D. 1998. The ARL “Investment in Electronic Resources” Study: Final Report to the Council on Library and Information Resources. Available at http://www.arl.org/stats/specproj/jewell.html.

Jordan, William. 2000. My Gateway at the University of Washington Libraries. Information Technology and Libraries 19(4):180-185.

Ketchell, Debra S. 2000. Too Many Channels: Making Sense Out of Portals and Personalization. Information Technology and Libraries 19(4):175-179.

Kovacs, Diane. 2000a. Building Electronic Library Collections: The Essential Guide to Selection Criteria and Core Subject Collections. New York: Neal-Schuman.

Kovacs, Diane K., and Angela Elkhordy. 2000b. Collection Development in Cyberspace: Building an Electronic Library Collection. Library Hi Tech 18(4):335-359.

Kyrillidou, Martha. 2000. Research Library Spending on Electronic Scholarly Information Is on the Rise. ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC. No. 213, December.

Lakos, Amos, and Chris Gray. 2000. Personalized Library Portals as an Organizational Culture Change Agent. Information Technology and Libraries 19(4):169-174.

Landesman, Margaret, and Johann Van Reenen. 2000. Creating Congruence. JEP: the Journal of Electronic Publishing 6(2). Available at http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/06-02/landesman.html.

Leggate, Peter, and Mike Hannant. 2000. The Archiving of Online Journals. Learned Publishing 13(4):246-250.

Liblicense. 2000. LIBLICENSE Guide to Digital Information. Available at http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/software.shtml.

Library of Congress. 1999. Collections Policy Statements: Electronic Resources. Available at http://lcweb.loc.gov/acq/devpol/electron.html.

LiveRef: a Registry of Real-Time Digital Reference Services. 2001. Available at http://www.public.iastate.edu/~CYBERSTACKS/LiveRef.htm#livereference.

Loghry, Patricia A., and Amy W. Shannon. 2000. Managing Selection and Implementation of Electronic Products: One Tiny Step in Organization, One Giant Step for the University of Nevada, Reno. Serials Review 26(3):32-44.

Los Alamos National Laboratory. 2000. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available at http://arxiv.org/.

Luther, Judy. 2000. White Paper on Electronic Journal Usage Statistics. Washington, D.C.: Council on Library and Information Resources. Also available at https://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub94/contents.html.

Marcum, Deanna. 2000. Digital Archiving. College & Research Library News 61(9):794-797, 807.

Michalak, Sara. 2000. The Evolution of SPARC. Serials Review 26(1):10-21.

MIT Libraries. 1997. Toward a Networked Resources Policy. Available at http://macfadden.mit.edu:9500/networked/policy.html.

MIT Libraries. 1998a. Process “Map” for Acquisition of Electronic Information Products. Available at http://macfadden.mit.edu:9500/networked/webmap.pdf.

MIT Libraries. 1998b. ERESCAT/NERD Subgroup on Workflow for Electronic Resources Workflow Proposal. Available at http://macfadden.mit.edu:9500/networked/erescat.htm.

MIT Libraries. 1998c. Partnership Between Product Sponsor and Assistant Acquisitions Librarian for Digital Resources. Available at http://macfadden.mit.edu:9500/networked/partnership.html.

Montgomery, Carol Hansen, and JoAnne L. Sparks. 2000. The Transition to an Electronic Journal Collection: Managing the Organizational Changes. Serials Review 26(3):4-18.

Morgan, Eric Lease. 1999. MyLibrary: A Model for Implementing a User-Centered, Customizable Interface to a Library’s Collection of Information Resources. Available at http://hegel.lib.ncsu.edu/development/mylibrary/sigir-99/.

Morgan, Eric Lease. 2000. Guest Editorial: The Challenges of User-Centered, Customizable Interfaces to Library Resources. Information Technology and Libraries. 19(4):166-168.

Morgan, Keith, and Tripp Reade. 2000. Pioneering Portals: MyLibrary@NCState. Information Technology and Libraries 19(4):191-198.

Morris, Sally. 2000. Archiving Electronic Publications: What are the Problems and Who Should Solve Them? Serials Review 26(3):64-68.

Mulliner, Kent. 2001. The “Big Deal”: I Beg to Differ. D-Lib Magazine 7(4). Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april01/04letters.html.

National Center for Biotechnology Information. 2001. LinkOutLinking from PubMed and Other Entrez Databases. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/static/linkoutoverview.html.

National Research Council. 2000. LC21: A Digital Strategy for the Library of Congress. Available at http://www.nap.edu/openbook/0309071445/html/R1.html.

Ockerbloom, John. 2000. Let’s Get Together: Or, How to Integrate Library Resources So Our Users Can Find Them. Paper presented at the Digital Library Federation Fall Forum, November 19, 2000, Chicago. Available at http://www.diglib.org/forums/fall00/ockerbloom.htm.

OhioLINK Library Advisory Committee. 2001. Letter to the Editor. D-Lib Magazine 7(4). Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april01/04letters.html.

Okerson, Ann. 2001. An ILL contract terms clearning (sic) house? E-mail posting to Liblicense-L Listserv (Feb. 5). Available at Liblicense-L List Archives: http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/ (accessed 29 June 2001).

Open Archives Initiative. 2001. Available at http://www.openarchives.org/.

Pennsylvania State University Libraries. 2001. ERLIC Shareware: Electronic Resources and Licensing Information Center. Available at http://www.libraries.psu.edu/iasweb/fiscal_data/ERLIC_SHARE/Publish/index.html.

Pennsylvania State University Libraries. 2000. Evaluating Electronic Resources. Available at http://www.libraries.psu.edu/crsweb/select/manual/guide.htm.

Pisani, Assunta. 2000. Stanford University Libraries/Academic Information Resources Paper presented at the Digital Library Federation Spring Forum, March 31, 2000, Atlanta, Georgia. Available at http://www.diglib.org/forums/spr2000/stanford/index.htm.

Principles for Emerging Systems of Scholarly Publishing. 2000. Available at http://www.arl.org/scomm/tempe.html.

Richter, Carole. 2001. RE: ILL & Licensing questions. E-mail posting to Liblicense-L Listserv (Feb. 2). Available at Liblicense-L List Archives: http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/0102/msg00026.html.

Roth, Dana. 2001. Sign of the timesmost cited sources in CA. E-mail message to SLA PAM Discussion List (Feb. 21). Note: Reported summary of article appearing in quarterly supplement to Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index (CASSI) 2000(4):28.

Rothenberg, Jeff. 1999. Avoiding Technological Quicksand: Finding a Viable Technical Foundation for Digital Preservation: A Report to the Council on Library and Information Resources. Available at https://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract/pub77.html.

Rothenberg, Jeff. 2000. An Experiment in Using Emulation to Preserve Digital Publications. Koninklije Bibliotheek. Available at http://www.kb.nl/nedlib/results/emulationpreservationreport.pdf.

Rowe, Ronda. 2000. An Interim Solution for Managing Electronic Resources at UT Austin. Paper presented at the Digital Library Federation Fall Forum, November 20, 2000, Chicago. Available at http://www.diglib.org/forums/fall00/ramirez_files/frame.htm.

Sanders, Thomas R., Helen Goldman, and Jack Fitzpatrick. 2000. Title-Level Analytics for Journal Aggregators. Serials Review 26(4):18-29.

Sanville, Thomas J. 2000. A Method Out of the Madness: OhioLINK’s Collaborative Response to the Serials Crisis. Three Years LaterProgress Report. Paper presented at the North American Serials Interest Group Conference, June 22-25, 2000, University of California, San Diego.

Shim, Wonsik, Charles R. McClure, and John Carlo Bertot. 2000. ARL E-metrics Project: Developing Statistics and Performance Measures to Describe Electronic Information Services and Resources for ARL Libraries. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries. Also available at http://www.arl.org/stats/newmeas/emetrics/phaseone.pdf.

Simon Fraser University. 2000. jake2marc. Available at http://www.lib.sfu.ca/kiosk/mjordan/jake/.

Smith, Kenneth R. 2000. New Roles And Responsibilities For The University Library: Advancing Student Learning Through Outcomes Assessment. ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 213 (December):2-5.

Soete, George J,. and Trisha Davis. 1999. Managing the Licensing of Electronic Products. SPEC Kit 248. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries.

Stanley, Nancy Markle, Angelina F. Holden, and Betty L. Nirnberger. 2000. Taming the Octopus: Getting a Grip on Electronic Resources. Serials Librarian 38(3-4):363-368.

Stoffle, Carla. 2001. A Library View of the SPARC Initiative. Against the Grain (April):34, 36,38. Also available at http://www.arl.org/sparc/ATG.pdf.

Tennant, Roy. 1999. Human and Humane Assistance. Library Journal Digital (June 15). Available at http://www.libraryjournal.com/articles/infotech/digitallibraries/19990615_4807.asp.

University of Illinois Libraries. 2000. Electronic Collections Plan. Available at http://www.library.uiuc.edu/eirc/finaldraft.htm. [Note: Access to this site is restricted.]

University of Michigan Libraries. 1997. Electronic Resources Task Force Report. Available at http://www.lib.umich.edu/libhome/staff/eresources/TFreport.html.

University of Michigan Libraries. 2000. Selection Structure. Available at http://www.lib.umich.edu/libhome/staff/eresources/structure.htm.

University of Southern California Libraries. University of Southern California Library Collection Development Policy Statement for Information in Electronic Formats. Available at http://academic.uofs.edu/organization/codes/uscl.html.

University of Texas Libraries. 1999. General Libraries Digital Library Collection Development Framework. Available at http://www.lib.utexas.edu/admin/cird/policies/subjects/framework.html.

University of Texas Libraries. 2000a. Licensing & Copyright of Electronic Resources: License Process. Available at http://staff.lib.utexas.edu/divisions/dlsd/dls/process/index.html.

University of Texas Libraries. 2000b. Recently Added Resources. Available at http://www.lib.utexas.edu/Indexes/new.html.

University of Texas Libraries. 2000c. UT Library Online User Guides. Available at http://www.lib.utexas.edu/guides/index.html.

University of Texas Libraries. 2000d. Off-Campus Access to Library Databases and Electronic Resources.

University of Virginia Libraries. 2001. Library of Tomorrow Program. Available at http://staff.lib.virginia.edu/LofT/.

University of Washington Libraries. 2001a. Information Resources Council Task Force on Electronic Information Acquisition and Licensing: Draft Principles, Guidelines and Checklists. Available at http://staffweb.lib.washington.edu/irc/comm-taskforces/tf_licensing_checklists.html.

University of Washington Libraries. 2001b. Connecting to the Libraries. Available at http://www.lib.washington.edu/help/connect.html.

University of Washington Libraries. 2001c. Known Issues and Bugs. Available at http://www.lib.washington.edu/help/knownissues/.

University of Washington Libraries. 2001d. Proxy Server Wizard. Available at http://www.lib.washington.edu/asp/browser/proxy.asp.

University of Washington Libraries. 2001e. Healthlinks. Available at http://healthlinks.washington.edu/.

University of Washington Libraries. 2001f. Why Use My Gateway? Available at http://www.lib.washington.edu/resource/help/MyGateway.html.

Van de Sompel, Herbert, and Patrick Hochstenbach. 1999a. Reference Linking in a Hybrid Library Environment, Part 1: Frameworks for Linking. D-Lib Magazine 5(4). Available at http://dlib.ejournal.ascc.net/dlib/april99/van_de_sompel/04van_de_sompel-pt1.html.

Van de Sompel, Herbert, and Patrick Hochstenbach. 1999b. Reference Linking in a Hybrid Library Environment, Part 2: SFX, a Generic Linking Solution. D-Lib Magazine 5(4). Available at http://dlib.ejournal.ascc.net/dlib/april99/van_de_sompel/04van_de_sompel-pt2.html.

Van de Sompel, Herbert, and Patrick Hochstenbach. 1999c. Reference Linking in a Hybrid Library Environment, Part 3: Generalizing the SFX solution in the “SFX@Ghent & SFX@LANL” experiment. D-Lib Magazine 5(10). Available at http://dlib.ejournal.ascc.net/dlib/october99/van_de_sompel/10van_de_sompel.html.

Van de Sompel, Herbert, and Oren Beit-Arie. 2001. Open Linking in the Scholarly Information Environment Using the Open URL Framework. D-Lib Magazine 7(3). Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march01/vandesompel/03vandesompel.html.

Yale University Libraries. 1998. Examining Networked Resources. Available at http://www.library.yale.edu/ecollections/ereschecklist.pdf.

Yale University Libraries. 2000a. Contact Information for Electronic Resources Licensed by Yale University Library. Available at http://www.library.yale.edu/ecollections/contactinfo.html.

Yale University Libraries. 2000b. CoDGeR (Committee for Digital General Resources). Available at http://www.library.yale.edu/CDC/public/subcommittees/codger/.

Yale University Libraries. 2001. Yale and Elsevier Science Plan E-Journal Archive. liblicense-l. (Feb. 26). Available at http://kokopeli.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/0102/msg00078.html.


Skip to content